The Trump administration has continued this practice, as evidenced by passages from the Foreign Office`s online database, Texts of International Agreements, which the U.S. is a Party (TIAS). This database is the only current public database that contains the text of such agreements, but it is far from complete. As the site itself points out, classified documents are excluded from reports. And the corresponding law on declarations does not even require the publication of all unclassified agreements. Considering that the exact number of agreements is difficult to pinpoint, 104 agreements were reported in the first year of the Trump administration, according to the database. This corresponds to previous years (the annual average of the database is 99 agreements per year). However, only 39 agreements have been notified in 2018. It is unclear whether this reflects a real decline, whether the site is simply not up to date, or whether a smaller percentage of the agreements reached on the database have been notified. (This uncertainty itself shows the inadequacy of the transparency of the process.) The ex ante executive agreements of Congress are similar to many administrative provisions, as they are often based on vague or broad legal authorizations and are concluded by a large number of executive agencies. Some of the same concerns expressed in the framework of administrative regulation – legality, the registration of interest groups, reckless or corrupt bureaucratic measures, etc.
– are also related to ex ante agreements between Congress and the executive branch. But there is at least one key difference: administrative provisions are subject to a complex administrative framework, but ex ante agreements between Congress and the executive branch are not subject to administrative law or any other accountability framework that goes beyond an incomplete and unreased reporting obligation. Although the laws enforcing the agreement between the United States and Colombia were introduced in April 2008 (RST. 5724, 110th Congress), house leadership found that President Bush introduced the bill without sufficient consultation with Congress, and the House of Representatives then voted 224-195, which governs Section 151 of the Trade Act of 1974. , which provides for an automatic discharge of the commission, a deadline for the vote on the final passage. , as well as requests for consideration by the Plenary Assembly, would not be applicable to the legislation (H.Res.